« 60TH ANNUAL TONY AWARDS | Main | "THE VIEW" BIDS FAREWELL TO MEREDITH VIEIRA »

Online vs. in-store shopping - one publicist's experience.

I have recently been in the market for a new messenger bag. Since my time has been limited, I decided I would browse online to see what brands I liked and where I could buy them. Don’t get my wrong, I love my Tumi, but it can be too large for my needs. I wanted something smaller and more casual. I prefer a designer bag (or at least “designed”), a good price (around $300 for a designer label –OUCH, I KNOW – and under $100 for a non-designer brand), highly functional and of good quality (it MUST last).

It’s been a couple of years since I shopped online. I remember it used to be easy to shop with sites full of functionality and images. I’d simply point, click and be done… but not anymore. I went through many sites and found very few that had decent stock, site functionality, product details or even an option buy them! I visited: Bloomingdales.com, LouisVuitton.com, Prada.com, Macys.com, Barneys.com, SaksFifthAvenue.com, JackSpade.com, ManhattanPortage.com, Bluefly.com, Gucci.com and Diesel.com.

Ability to see products:
Loser: Prada. Their website doesn’t even have a product list, merely a fashion image on their home page. I couldn’t even see the latest collection or where to find a store. It was definitely the worst site in my shopping tour.
Winner: Gucci. Their website had a complete selection of all of their products. However; I recommend they show more angles of the bags and what they look like inside.

Ability to purchase products:
Loser: Obviously Prada, but also Diesel. Diesel had images of their products but no shopping cart or prices.
Worst offender: Diesel. If you’re going to show your products, at least give a price and a way to buy them.
Winner: Manhattan Portage and Bluefly, clear shopping carts that seem to work. Since I didn’t complete my purchase, I can’t comment fully.

Functionality:
I was shocked to see poor functionality on almost every site. I wanted to see close ups as well as the insides of each bag. The only site to offer this option was ManhattanPortage.com.
The worst offenders: Everyone, but particularly Macy’s was the worst. I couldn’t even figure out how to narrow my search to only messenger bags.
Winner: Manhattan Portage.
Runner-up: Jack Spade, which gave a close view of the products’ details such as stitching, clasps and logo; unfortunately no close ups on the inside of the bag.

Selection:
When looking at these sites, I wanted a large variety of different bags. I’ve been to nearly all the brick and mortar retail shops and I know they have a large selections.
Worst offenders: Bloomingdale’s, Macy’s, Barney’s, Saks because they are all department stores that had only a piece of their goods available online.
Winners: Bluefly because of the great selection of Prada. However; they had no other brands. Manhattan Portage and Jack Spade both had a great selection of bags in various shapes, sizes and uses.

In the end the winners for best site are Manhattan Portage and Jack Spade. I’d like a bag that is more designed than Manhattan Portage so I might go for a Jack Spade but I will swing by Bloomingdale’s on my way home.


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 12, 2006 12:34 PM.

The previous post in this blog was 60TH ANNUAL TONY AWARDS.

The next post in this blog is "THE VIEW" BIDS FAREWELL TO MEREDITH VIEIRA.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.32